Jewry, "Israel", Zionism...

The Media Calls him Al Qaeda, but his Jewish Father calls him Adam Pearlman

by Curt Maynard
Monday, 04 September 2006

Source: Ziopedia

[Editor's note:  How much longer will it take Western citizens to wake up to the fact that all those scary terror organisations such as Al Qaeda and Hezbollah are actually creations of their own governments, or to be more precise, Mossad, CIA, MI5 and alike. Their sole purpose is to scare ordinary citizens into blind support of their criminal governments, enabling them to dismantle civil rights and social services in the name of combatting terror and create excuses for brutal oppression of whoever is in the way of profit maximisation for their neo-fascist corporations. Sure, there might be many naive, true believers amongst ordinary members of those phony terror organisations, but the people in power, the likes of Saudi  billionaire Osama Bin Laden, are actually part of the Orwellian elite.]

The CNN article[1] is entitled “American al Qaeda: U.S. should convert to Islam,” and if that wasn’t scary enough the article then quotes one of the speakers on the alleged “Al Qaeda” tape, a [socalled] Jew named Adam Pearlman, “We invite all Americans and believers to Islam, whatever their role and status in Bush and Blair's world order…Decide today, because today could be your last day.” The article then quotes an alleged “expert,” on Al Qaeda and terrorism, a woman named Laura Mansfield, who says, “the time reference could indicate an attack is near. Muslims believe that non-believers should be given a chance to convert before they are attacked.” Booga booga!

What the CNN article never mentions is that Adam Gadhn, or “Azzam the American,” as the media likes to refer to him, is in reality a Jew from California named Adam Pearlman. I’m not kidding reader, I’m as serious as a heart attack, Azzam the American is a Jew. CNN isn’t the only negligent news agency, not a single one of the television networks have mentioned Gadahn’s/Pearlman’s pedigree, not one. The only news source I am aware of that has mentioned the fact that “Azzam the American” is Jewish, was the LA Times and the Washington Post, and then only in the most cryptic manner.

Edward Griffin - Soviet Subversion of the Free Press - An Interview with ex-KGB Agent Yuri Bezmenov (1984)

Also available here: 1, 2 3

30 min. long.

Note: Seems to be incomplete, only a few parts of the whole interview.


This is Edward Griffin's shocking video interview Soviet Subversion of the Free Press (1984) where he interviews ex-KGB agent and soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov who decided to openly reveal KGB's subversive tactics against western society as a whole.

Bezmenov explains how Jewish Marxist ideology is destabilizing the economy and purposefully pushing the US into numerous crises so that a Big Brother tyranny can be put into place in Washington, how most Americans don’t even realize that they are under attack, and that normal parliamentary procedures will not alter the federal government’s direction.

He then explains how Marxist leaders use informers to make lists of anti-Communist and other politically incorrect people who they want to execute once they - actually a Jewish oligarchy - come to power. The oligarch’s secret lists include “civil rights” activists and idealistically-minded “useful idiot” leftists as well.

Bezmenov provides several real world examples of how Marxist leaders even execute and/or imprison each other. Also he explains how American embassy employees were known to betray Soviets attempting to defect, how their existed a “triangle of hate” in the Soviet government, why he realized that Marxism-Leninism was a murderous doctrine, and how the CIA ignored (or didn’t care) about Communist subversion.

He also mentions that revolutions throughout history are never the result of a majority movement, but of a small dedicated and highly-organized group who seize power, whether for good or bad.

Next he explains how the American mass media spread lies about life in the Soviet Union. Bezmenov also explains how the LOOK magazine article falsely claimed that the Russian people were proud of their victory in the Second World War, where in reality the Judeo-Bolshevik-Communist-Marxist government was happy that Hitler had been defeated so that they could remain in power.

Find out how the KGB utilized various individuals to undermine the western society in its morals and values.

Shorter outakes:


Esau's 36 methods of War.

-- In Kingdom-Identity [at] yahoogroups [dot] com, "hengist_w" <[email protected] > wrote:

Educated people understand that Esau intends to kill Jacob.

"Esau hated Jacob... and Esau said... I (will) slay my brother Jacob." Gen. 27:41

"Esau was a designing and deceitful man, who hunted after the hearts of men and he stole their minds." Jasher 29:20-23

There are many books written about the 36 Strategies and the different methods to implement them. They are taught to Esau from childhood and are used by the mother in her daily shopping and by the general on the battlefield.

Esau's 36 methods of War.

"The greatest victory is the victory gained without battle."

1 - Hide important things in the open for all to see. ( This means to create a front that eventually becomes imbued with an atmosphere or impression of familiarity, within which the strategist may maneuver unseen while all eyes are trained
to see obvious familiarities. )
2 - Help save a state from evil forces by invading them.
3 - Use surrogates to do what you don't wish to be seen doing.
4 - Make impossible demands upon potential victims.
5 - Start a house fire and help save the contents.
6 - Talk one thing - do something else.
7 - Make something from nothing.
8 - Use an unknown technique.
9 - Help the enemy destroy himself with internal dissensions.
10 - Smile with knife in hand.
11 - Sacrifice friends to win victory for a greater good.
12 - Quietly pick up unattended property as your own.
13 - Make a hidden enemy disclose himself by creating a disturbance.
14 - Pretend the worthless is valuable.
15 - Entice an enemy from his place of strength.
16 - Never attack a desperate enemy.
17 - Exchange something worthless for something valuable.
18 - Make every attempt to capture the friendship of the leader of a powerful opposition.
19 - If unable to answer problems or ideas - remove or discredit the author or authors of the problems.
20 - Replace an enemies loss of direction with your own program.
21 - Pretend the cicada's empty shell is alive. (This means leaving behind false appearances created for strategic
purposes. Like the cicada shell, the facade remains intact, but the real action is now elsewhere.)
22 - Denounce friends to establish believable "bona fides".
23 - Keep captive populations intimidated.
24 - Promise one thing - deliver another.
25 - Attack enemies within reach - keep others neutral.
26 - The hidden message.
27 - Pretend not to notice the approach of an enemy.
28 - Destroy the bridge. ( Maneuver enemies into a point of no return by baiting them with what look like advantages and opportunities.)
29 - Be wise by playing the fool. ( Dazzle and deceive the eyes of opponents by showy displays.)
30 - Provoke strong emotion - we good enemy bad.
31 - The beauty trap. (Also known as the "honey pot".)
32 - If weak, appear weaker than you really are.
33 - Use double agents.
34 - Self inflicted wounds. (Inflict minor injury on oneself to gain the enemy's trust, consider 911)
35 - Scheme in continuous circles (Interlocking stratagems) When facing a more powerful enemy, you don't oppose by force,
and don't concentrate all your resources on only one avenue of strategy; you keep different plans operating simultaneously in an overall scheme.
36 - When all else fails - Run !

The Significance of the Holocaust Revisionist Statements of President Ahmadinejad

The Significance of the Holocaust Revisionist Statements of President Ahmadinejad:
 An Open Letter to Iran’s Ambassador to the United Nations
by Paul Grubach

October 30, 2006
 Ambassador Javad Zarif
 Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations
 622 3rd Ave., 34th Fl.
 New York, New York  10017
 Dear Ambassador Javad Zarif,
 In reference to political Zionism and certain Western governments, President Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying: “They have fabricated a legend under the name of Massacre of the Jews, and they hold it higher than God himself, religion itself and the prophets themselves.  If somebody in their country questions God, nobody says anything, but if somebody denies the myth of the massacre of the Jews, the Zionist loudspeakers and the governments in the pay of Zionism will start to scream.”

About those faked Beirut photos...

The following is commentary by about the incidence with the photoshopped photo of Beirut in 2006. We at couldn't agree more.



Looking back at the Public Relations aspect of the recent debacle in Lebanon, one incident deserves a final parting examination. And that is the furor that erupted over a Reuter's photograph of Beirut that was obviously doctored.

Beirut Photo After

In the above, the top panel is the original photograph, and the bottom is what Reuter's released. The obviousness of the alteration quickly attracted notice and the photographer was suspended and Reuter's withdrew the photo. Isdrael then claimed that all the work done by Reuiter's in Lebanon, in particulat the Qana massacre, was now suspect.

How very convenient.

My "day job" is in an industry that is expert at image trickery. I work in film visual effects. It was that expertise that resulted in my outing of the Vincent Foster murder almost 14 years ago and launched this website.

But one does not need to be an expert to see that the altered photo is altered. Someone used the rubber stamp brush in Photoshop to swirl the clouds around, causing the repeating pattern seen in the plumes.


Take a look at the original image. Does it need alternation or enhancement? Do the changes made with photoshop in any way alter the content or meaning of the photo, or make the captionm more or less appropriate? No. The alteration has no purpose at all ... except to call attention to itself, at a time when Israel desperately needed to discredit the reports coming out of Lebanon.

One final point. Photographers do not select which of their photos get published and which so not. That decision is made by numerous other people, including the photo editor, the section editor, and finally the managing editor. For this photo to have gone out, many people had to sign off on it. Do you really think that the altered photo got all the way through Reuter's management, office staff, photo editors, webmasters, etc. without someone noticing the obvious signs of fakery?

Me neither.

This fake was designed to be spotted. It was put out by Reuter's intentionally with the sole purpose of handing Israel a means to discount media reports of the war crimes being committed inside Lebanon.

Who in Reuter's put the welfare of Israel above their oen company's credibility, I wonder?

Good-bye Main Stream Media, Hello alternative

Thursday, September 07, 2006

By Mark Meza

Many mainstream television programs today claim to offer the viewer an impartial approach on any given issue, this just isn’t true, there is no longer any such thing as an unbiased television program in the MSM [mainstream media]. For all intents and purposes every network is subservient to its owners and management, which is largely pro-Zionist in our contemporary world. Many people like to point out that the networks are “owned,” by stockholders and “managed,” by a “Board of Directors,” and that the only bias they have is one directed at profit. When I hear this I feel it necessary to point out that Enron was also a publicly traded corporation and it too had a Board of Directors. Despite this it only took a few individuals at the very top to drive the corporation into the ground. In other words Enron stockholders had no say whatsoever in the direction Enron was taking, if they had, the corporation wouldn’t have gone bankrupt, it’s really ! a matter of economics 101, stockholders aren’t interested in pursuing policies that will reduce their holdings by more than a thousand percent, but nonetheless, that’s exactly what happened at Enron. The television networks are also in theory “owned,” by stockholders, but the networks are managed by hardcore Zionists whose sole agenda is as un-American and downright treasonous as anything any enemy of this country could ever perpetrate on the people of this nation.

The Next Phase of the Middle East War

by Michel Chossudovsky

September 4, 2006

Israel's war on Lebanon is an integral part of a US sponsored "military roadmap". 

The war on Lebanon, which has resulted in countless atrocities including the destruction of the nation's economy and civilian infrastructure, is "a stage" in a sequence of carefully planned military operations. 

Lebanon constitutes a strategic corridor between Israel and North-western Syria. The underlying objective of this war was the militarization of Lebanon, including the stationing of foreign troops, as a precondition for carrying out the next phase of a broader military agenda. 

Formally under a UN mandate, the foreign troops to be stationed on Lebanese soil on the immediate border with Syria, will be largely although not exclusively from NATO countries. This military force mandated by the UN Security Council is by no means neutral. It responds directly to US and Israeli interests. 

Moreover, the timely withdrawal of Syrian troops, following the February 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri has contributed to opening up a "new space". The withdrawal of Syrian troops served Israeli interests. The timely pullout was of strategic significance: it was a major factor in the timing and planning of the July 2006 IDF attacks on Lebanon. 

In the aftermath of the Israeli bombings and the "ceasefire", UN Security Council Resolution 1701, drafted by France and the US in close consultation with the Israeli government, has paved the way for the militarization of Lebanon, under a bogus UN mandate. 

The Next Phase of the Middle East War

Confirmed by official statements and military documents, the US in close coordination with Britain (and in consultation with its NATO partners), is planning to launch a war directed against Iran and Syria. US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton has already initiated the draft of a UN Security Council resolution with a view to imposing sanctions on Tehran for its alleged (nonexistent) nuclear weapons program. Whether this resolution is adopted is not the main issue. The US may decide to proceed in defiance of the Security Council, following a veto by Russia and/or China. The vote of France and Britain, among the permanent members has already been secured. 


Please follow the weblink for the complete article

Will Amnesty International help Mr. Germar Rudolf?

This is a letter from Paul Grubach to Amnesty International.


August 16, 2006
Amnesty International




I have been informed that one of the main purposes of your organization is to defend human rights worldwide. I am writing to you now to inform you of a very serious human rights violation that is taking place in your own nation, and to request that you would publicly speak out about it.

Mr. Germar Rudolf, a former chemistry doctoral candidate at the prestigious Max Planck Institute, is a German citizen who was forced to flee his native Germany because he has questioned and refuted certain aspects of the Jewish Holocaust story. In short, I believe that he showed that the alleged Auschwitz gas chambers never existed. In the United States, near Chicago, Revisionist scholar Rudolf was recently torn from his American wife and their child and delivered to Germany. He is in prison in Stuttgart.

George Galloway: Israel is a Terrorist State

George Galloway has spoken out in support of Lebanon, saying he believes Hizbollah is justified in defending Lebanon against Israeli attacks. The Respect MP also lambasted media coverage of the war and said the UN resolution means nothing.


Note how the techies at Murdoch’s Sky News potted down the volume on Galloway, as he made too much sense and was cleaning the anchor’s clock, and then brought up the volume of b-roll footage to drown him out. You’d think, by now, the corporate media would steer clear of Galloway, as he consisently tells the truth, a forbidden fruit in the fraudulent “war on terror,” that is to say state-sponsored terrorism against Arabs and Muslims resisting the murderous aggression of Israel and the United States.

alternative download
alternative download


Also see this commentary by Daryl Bradford Smith
"If Zionists control the media, then why would George Galloway be allowed to criticize Israel on mainstream television or radio?"

En judisk avhoppare varnar Amerika

The following item is the exposé "Benjamin Freedman - A Jewish Defector Warns America" in Swedish. Also available in English, and Finnish


En judisk avhoppare varnar Amerika

av Benjamin H. Freedman

Se även: Orginal, Finsk Översättning

Länkar samt kommentarer av JAH, översatta av

Benjamin H. Freedman var en av 1900-talets mest fascinerande och häpnadsväckande personer. Freedman, född 1890, var en framgångsrik judisk affärsman från New York och stod som huvudägare till Woodbury Soap Company när det begav sig. Han bröt med den organiserade judendomen efter den judisk-kommunistiska segern 1945, och tillbringade återstoden av sitt liv, samt merparten av sin ansenliga förmögenhet på minst 2,5 miljoner dollar, med att exponera det judiska förtrycket som kommit att inhölja Förenta Staterna. Freedman visste vad han talade om eftersom han varit en insider på högsta nivå i judiska organisationer och judiska intriger för att erövra makten i vår nation. Freedman var personligen bekant med Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy och många fler pådrivare och omstörtare i vår tid. Det här talet hölls inför en patriotisk åhörarskara 1961 på Willard Hotel i staden Washington å Conde McGinleys patriotiska tidskrift Common Senses vägnar. Även om detta vittomspännande och oförberedda tal har blivit föråldrat i vissa mindre avseenden är Freedmans väsentliga budskap till oss -- hans varning till Väst -- mer angeläget än någonsin tidigare.
-- K.A.S.



Sionisterna styr Förenta Staterna

Första Världskriget

Dödläge år 1916. Sionisterna erbjuder att gå Förenta Staterna med i krig

Förenta staterna tvingas med i Första Världskriget efter Balfourdeklarationen.


Effekten på tyskarna å de förstod judisk aktivitet

Freedman säger att det första världskiget drogs igång mot Tyskland.

Tyska fångläger år 1933

Tyskar bekämpade judisk kontroll.

1933: Judar förklarar heligt krig (och handelskrig) mot Tyskland

Reichskristallnacht samt upprustning

1961: Kärnvapenkrig? För Israel?

Sekretess (likt sionist avtalet med Förenta Staterna) kan inträffa igen

Historia om "judar"

Kol Nidre: Bevis om otrogenhet

George Washington's Vision




Sionisterna styr Förenta Staterna

Här i Förenta Staterna har sionisterna och deras religionsfränder total kontroll över vår regering. Av många anledningar, för många och alltför komplexa för att gå närmare in på här och nu, styr sionisterna och deras religionsfränder Förenta Staterna som vore de det här landets enväldiga monarker. Det kan hända att ni menar att detta är ett allt för generellt uttalande, men låt mig visa er vad som hände medan vi alla sov.


Syndicate content